Top 5 Pain Points of Companies and How Blockchain Can Solve Them

Top 5 Pain Points of Companies and How Blockchain Can Solve Them

In this article, we’re going to explore the challenges of managing Enterprise IT infrastructure,

how blockchain helps Enterprise IT infrastructure, and unique challenges of integrating blockchain technology into your organization.Technology is constantly changing the way companies do business. Some technologies, ‘game-changing’ ones, actually go further than that and change the way companies are constructed and built. The competitiveness of a company these days is a direct function of its technological adoption and prowess.

However, it’s very challenging to manage new implementations of technology in a cost-effective way. IT solutions implemented incorrectly might be needlessly complex, and might be too transformative, requiring substantial retraining of employees in the organization. By harnessing technology appropriately, your organization can gain a competitive advantage – but you do need a roadmap to prevent you from becoming lost in the jungle of solutions. Blockchain technologies are currently becoming a hot topic for organizations, and I’d like to help provide this blockchain roadmap for companies out there.

5 Common Pain Points Companies Face

Trust Is Expensive Which Makes Collaboration Hard

There are obvious benefits when two organizations collaborate effectively. Many organizations form consortiums to leverage mutually beneficial ways to collaborate. Naturally, the challenge always comes down to trust. Organizations are run by groups of people, and groups of people don’t trust each other readily. Companies – even the ones who are in decade-long partnerships – may have competing interests and differing agendas. Who owns the servers that the shared system uses? Who has access to the cloud account that runs the apps? What happens when one organization wants to leave the consortium? How are decisions made between separate entities?

Data Jealousy Leads to Less Valuable Data

In 2017, the Economist proclaimed that data is more valuable than oil. Ginny Rometty of IBM declared it a ‘natural resource.’ The biggest and most powerful companies on our planet (Google, Facebook, Amazon, Apple, etc.) own the most data. Unfortunately, this mindset has led some companies into the rabbit hole of ‘data jealousy.’ This is the practice of refusing to share data, even with partnering companies. Big Data is only valuable if it’s big enough, and most companies only own data from “their point of view.” They struggle to leverage their data effectively because they only have access to the limited dataset they produce.

This is, of course, another systems issue. Companies that try to share data with each other on regular centralized systems come directly face to face with the questions: Who owns the actual data? Who can access the data and how frequently? How can I be sure that no one in my partner company tampered with the data? How can I be sure that my own data is accessed on a ‘need to know’ basis? The inability to answer these questions has led to investments in big data and analytics that do not show an ROI to an organization.

Reliance on Physical Documents Makes Audits Slow and Expensive

Most companies today still heavily rely on physical documents to ensure their business runs smoothly. This causes all kinds of headaches, especially during audits. It’s easy to digitize the documents. The challenge is keeping sensitive digital information secure. Since digital documents are easy to tamper with, they often cannot be relied upon for audits. This makes the audit process tedious and costly. During an audit, each division has competing interests with other divisions. Every division wants to pass the audit, even if it means another division fails. This is why we can’t use centralized systems’ digital documents as a basis for audit – they can be tampered with, and even server logs can be tampered by the IT division.

Automation Between Separate Companies Is Hard to Execute Fairly

While many companies seek to automate their operations, the challenge becomes ensuring that automation between companies is completed in a fair manner. For example, if two companies are partnering and have a business process automation solution in place to manage their collaboration, which company gets to own the server that runs the solution? No matter how well designed the centralized system is, the company that owns the server will have more control over the initiative. Even if you have a system that is really well-programmed, a server owner can still – literally – pull the plug on the automation.

Disaster Recovery and High Availability Systems Get Really Complicated and Pricey

Here’s how you create an Enterprise system these days: Maintain production uptime by adding a High Availability (HA) server. Maintain a failover system between Prod and HA. To ensure disaster preparedness, find another data center far away and put a server in there to act as a DRC. In case of further paranoia, get the DRC site an HA server as well. What about ‘putting it on the cloud’? Behind every cloud, there are computers too. Enterprise infrastructure is very familiar with declarations of ‘down for maintenance’ from every brand-name cloud. So you still set up DRCs or HA servers that interlink multiple cloud infras, just to make sure the business does not lose money from the downtime.

Companies today must maintain high availability of their IT systems. They must also ensure proper disaster recovery processes are in place. Unfortunately, these tools are continuing to rise in cost, which makes it hard for companies to stay profitable. Although technologies have become cheaper, customer expectations have become sky-high for constant access to apps and services, and are continuously increasing. This creates more demand for high-availability and DRC – not less. Even as companies shift towards cloud services, these enterprise data services can still become cost-prohibitive. Lower margin businesses are going to be priced out first.

How Blockchain Technology Helps Enterprise IT

Blockchain Enables Trusted Partnerships

The biggest challenge when creating systems of collaboration in a business consortium or partnership revolves around ensuring fairness between the parties. A blockchain can be used to ensure that each partner in the collaboration has control of the system – since each partner has a node of their own. If one partner tries to change the data in his or her node, the other nodes will immediately ostracize that node and ‘heal’ the data. Rather than having every partner put absolute trust to the company that runs the system, each partner can be secure in the understanding that its partners cannot tamper with decisions, data, or control.

Blockchains Enable Smaller Companies to Benefit From Big Data

Instead of small companies being stuck with their small silos of data, they can combine their data with other companies through the use of a blockchain, while maintaining the sovereignty of their data and their customers’ data. This enables more companies to access big data analytics instead of only the largest companies benefiting.

Blockchain Eliminates the Need For Physical Documents

Currently, it’s really hard to keep digital documents secure and safe. This forces many companies to keep paper records which are notoriously clumsy to work with. Imagine how much time is wasted trying to reconcile data across piles of paper? Time wasted is money wasted. Thankfully blockchains increase the ability to keep digital documents secure, which reduces the need to maintain physical paper documents for audit purposes or otherwise. This enables companies who leverage blockchains can reduce the time and money required to complete audits which will save money.

Blockchain Enables Business Process Automation With Smart Contracts

One of the most powerful concepts that blockchains enable is the use of smart contracts. Smart contracts are software contracts that execute predefined logic based on the parameters coded into the system. In other words, you can replace many business processes with software. For example, instead of hiring a team to handle contracts and procurement, you could run smart contracts that enforce the same procedures more effectively at a lower cost.

Some blockchain technologies (e.g., Nxt) use ‘smart transactions’ instead of smart contracts. Unlike smart contracts, which embed code inside the blockchain every time, smart transactions put the code inside the node that runs it, while referring to and using process templates inside the blockchain. This is less prone to coding errors and allows easier future tweaking of the code in Enterprise environments.

Other blockchains use different ways to ensure this type of flexibility, which is important since business processes in Enterprise environments constantly change. You need to be able to revise code you’ve deployed, in an agile fashion, quickly. This same concept can be more broadly applied to any business function that relies on multiparty business logic. Here’s a cheat code: Automation between parties enables better business SLAs, and blockchain enables automation between parties.

Blockchain Can Improve Data and Infrastructure Resilience

Traditional network architectures are heavily reliant on high availability & DRC servers to make sure the network data stays in sync. If there is a disaster scenario where one node is compromised, then the network is reliant on the backup server. This architecture is vulnerable to being compromised, whether by attacks, exploits, mismanagement, or disaster situations. In an equivalent blockchain architecture, there are two key advantages: data resilience and infrastructure resilience.

Data resilience is gained from the increase in total nodes on the network. Each node enforces consensus rules and prevents attackers from spreading false information. Infrastructure resilience is gained because each node can act as a backup server in case some nodes are taken down or compromised. This is a huge improvement over traditional infrastructure where the network might only rely on a single backup server. Lastly, the more nodes in a blockchain network, the more resilient the system is, whereas the opposite is true with traditional IT architecture.

Challenges When Implementing Blockchain Technology

While blockchains have the potential to improve the IT infrastructure of your organization, getting them integrating into your current systems requires some effort. Here are a few challenges to overcome when implementing a blockchain inside your organization.

Getting Buy-in From Upper Management

In order for any strategic initiative to be successful, the project leaders need to get support from management. Hiring a top tier blockchain consulting firm helps convince upper management that blockchain is worthy of company resources.

Ensuring Your Staff is Capable Of Supporting Blockchain

Whenever you’re considering adding new technology into your organization, it’s critical to consider your current staff. How advanced is your current IT staff? Do they have the time and ability to get skilled up?

Choosing the Right Blockchain For Your Needs

Not all blockchain projects are created equally, and each blockchain implementation makes necessary tradeoffs to maximize the intended use case. Be sure to define your needs upfront and ensure the correct blockchain is matched to your needs. Starting with a pilot project makes sense for many organizations.

Architecting the Right Solution Is Challenging

In order to maximize the chance of a successful implementation, it’s crucial that your organization gets the high-level architecture right. The best tool in the world is only effective if it’s used properly. If you don’t have expertise in house, consider hiring a consulting firm to guide the solution architecture.

What Should Be On-chain? What Should Stay Off-chain?

Blockchain technologies are incredible tools, but that doesn’t mean we should try to run our entire business on a blockchain. In fact, there are many use cases where a distributed ledger doesn’t make sense. Spend time upfront planning before moving into the implementation phase. It’s better to start small than trying to bite off more than you can chew.

Let’s Wrap Up

Blockchains are incredible tools, but they need to be approached with care. In order to maximize their benefit, consider hiring a reputable consulting firm to see if blockchain can help your business, and starting with a pilot project. As your team gets more comfortable with the technology, you can continue to build your footprint, letting the technology grow in value as you collaborate more.

Article Produced By
Ms. Pandu Sastrowardoyo

Ms. Pandu Sastrowardoyo is a Co-Founder of Blockchain Zoo, Supervisory Board Member of Asosiasi Blockchain Indonesia, Senior Partner of Blocksphere, Co-Founder of Human-ID.org and Kendi.io, Former IBM ASEAN Senior Consultant & Territory General Manager of MSPs. Listed among 100 global blockchain leaders.

https://www.coinspeaker.com/pain-points-blockchain-can-solve/

David https://markethive.com/david-ogden

This is Why Ripple Removed xRapid xVia and xCurrent from their Site

This is Why Ripple Removed xRapid, xVia and xCurrent from their Site

                             

The Cryptoverse was abuzz recently when it was discovered that Ripple

made some noticeable changes to their website. We asked the company what happened. Recently, the company has removed mentions of their products xRapid, a source of on demand liquidity, xVia, used by businesses to plug into RippleNet to send payments, and xCurrent, a banking payment solution, from their website, which prompted debates in crypto forums.

Now, “instead of buying xCurrent or xVia, customers will connect to RippleNet — on-premises or through the cloud — and instead of buying xRapid, clients will use On-Demand Liquidity,” explained a spokesperson for Ripple. So these are not new products, bur the existing ones rebranded. However, aside from the cosmetics, that is, renaming of their xProducts, “very few things have changed and will not affect our customers.” Ripple moves towards building a network instead of a software suite, the spokesperson said. The company believes that combining all the different products into a unified network is a natural evolution of the company and its offerings, given the growth of their customer base, as well as the development of their standard and technology. "RippleNet is more than just a suite of software," the spokesperson said.

Meanwhile, Ripple's CEO Brad Garlinghouse said in August that the company is in talks over "multiple" potential investments and acquisitions, and the company followed that up with two new recent acquisitions. Also, as previously reported, Ripple made several announcements in the last week alone: Ripple’s developer initiative, Xpring, partnered up with a major global blockchain payments provider BitPay, with cryptocurrency wallet BRD Wallet, blockchain analysis company Chainalysis, and digital asset custody Anchorage; there is a new Xpring SDK (software development kit) available; and other new features to the core XRP Ledger and Interledger projects were introduced.

And while XRP price jumped on the acquisition news, the other announcements at the time did not seem to help it, as it continued trading sideways. This week, however, brought good news for XRP, as the price appreciated 11%, as well as 5.6% in the past month, though it fell 2% in the past 24 hours (05:06 UTC). Also, Ripple joined hands with U.S.-based major money transfer company MoneyGram a few months ago, after the acquisition rumors had been flying in the Cryptoverse since June. The company already started using xRapid product, now On-demand Liquidity, “to buy a portion of our currency needs in major receive markets.”

Article Produced By
Sead Fadilpaši?

Sead is a staff journalist at Cryptonews.com who covers cryptocurrency and blockchain news daily, writes analysis pieces, tests blockchain and cryptocurrency products. He's based in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Prior to joining Cryptonews.com he was a freelance, also was a journalist for Al Jazeera web. He spends his free time in music studios, recording songs for movies and cinema. Loves to break gadgets so he could fix them, enjoys exploring new music and loves tasty and equally unhealthy food.

https://cryptonews.com/news/this-is-why-ripple-removed-xrapid-xvia-and-xcurrent-from-the-4817.htm

David https://markethive.com/david-ogden

Ripple Price XRP Rallies 5 While BTC And ETH Decline

Ripple Price (XRP) Rallies 5% While BTC And ETH Decline

Ripple price is gaining bullish momentum above the $0.2600 resistance area against the US dollar.

The price is up around 5% and it recently broke the $0.2650 resistance area.

There is a connecting bullish trend line forming with support near $0.2550 on the hourly chart of the XRP/USD pair (data source from Kraken).

The price remains supported on dips and it could continue to rise towards the $0.2720 resistance.

Ripple price is rallying towards $0.2720 against the US Dollar, while bitcoin and Ethereum are sliding. XRP price might continue to rise towards $0.2720 or $0.2750.

Ripple Price Analysis

This past week, ripple price made many attempts to surpass the $0.2620 and $0.2650 resistance levels against the US Dollar. However, the XRP/USD pair failed to climb above $0.2650 and traded in a range. Finally, the bulls had an upper hand and the price rallied recently after forming a base near $0.2550. There was a sharp rise above the $0.2600 resistance and the 100 hourly simple moving average.

Moreover, the price broke the $0.2620 and $0.2650 resistance levels. It opened the doors for more gains and the price traded towards the $0.2700 level. A high was formed near $0.2691 and the price is currently retreating from highs. An immediate support is near the $0.2650 level. It coincides with the 23.6% Fib retracement level of the recent rally from the $0.2514 low to $0.2691 high.

On the downside, there are many supports near the $0.2620 and $0.2600 levels. Additionally, the 50% Fib retracement level of the recent rally from the $0.2514 low to $0.2691 high is near $0.2600. More importantly, there is a connecting bullish trend line forming with support near $0.2550 on the hourly chart of the XRP/USD pair. Therefore, dips from the current levels might find bids near $0.2620 or $0.2600.

The main support is near the $0.2550 level (the previous support base). On the upside, an immediate resistance is near the $0.2700 level. If there is an upside break above $0.2700, the price could test $0.2720 or even $0.2750 in the near term.

Ripple Price Analysis XRP USD

Looking at the chart, ripple price is clearly surging with a positive bias above $0.2620. There are high chances of it extending gains above the $0.2700 and $0.2720 resistance levels in the coming sessions. Conversely, if there is a downside correction, the bulls might protect the $0.2650 and $0.2620 levels (the previous resistance levels).

 

Technical Indicators

Hourly MACD – The MACD for XRP/USD is currently gaining pace in the bullish zone.

Hourly RSI (Relative Strength Index) – The RSI for XRP/USD is currently well above the 60 level, with bullish signs.

Major Support Levels – $0.2650, $0.2620 and $0.2550.

Major Resistance Levels – $0.2700, $0.2720 and $0.2750.

 

 

Aayush Jindal

David https://markethive.com/david-ogden

Ethereum ETH’s Next Big Move Is Just Around The Corner

Ethereum (ETH)’s Next Big Move Is Just Around The Corner

                              

Ethereum (ETH) is finally close to its next big move that we have been waiting to come to fruition for weeks.

The symmetrical triangle on the 4H chart will now either see a sharp breakout to the upside or to the downside. Considering that the cryptocurrency market is still due for another downtrend and the condition of the Stochastic RSI and RSI for ETH/USD on the 4H chart, I’m inclined to believe that we are very likely to break to the downside. The price remains below the 38.2% fib retracement level despite numerous attempts to break out. As long as that is the case, I have no reason to be bullish on Ethereum (ETH) or any other cryptocurrencies. 

Many traders are waiting for a trend reversal at this point but I think it might turn out of be very risky as we do not know where the floor is. If the price starts to decline from here, I would not be surprised to see it crash below even $155 during the next downtrend. I am open to the possibility of the price breaking the symmetrical triangle to the upside but I would consider that to be a fake out and an opportunity to add to short positions. In any case, I would be very surprised to see the price closing above the 61.8% fib retracement level on the daily time frame. In my opinion, we are close to seeing the current move coming to fruition with the price completing a big move to the downside. This next move is what is very likely to turn the sentiment bearish once again and I think that would be a point to expect a short term trend reversal.

The daily chart for Ethereum dominance (ETH.D) is an even better indicator of what is likely to follow in the near future. If the rising wedge breaks to the downside as I expect it to, then we have a very high probability of the altcoin market experiencing some serious pain. RSI on the daily chart for Ethereum dominance points to a similar outcome. We are now very close to seeing a breakout in ETH/USD but if we link this chart with the ETH/USD chart, we get the complete picture and that is the strong probability of the beginning of a new downtrend from here. 

Ethereum (ETH) and other cryptocurrencies are long way from breaking out of the current bear market just yet. In my opinion, we are in the second half of the ongoing bear market and there is no reason to be bullish on Ethereum (ETH) or other altcoins as long as the market has not made the inevitable moves to the downside. Everyone is looking to buy the dip but most of you who have been around since 2014 or before would know that this is now what it feels like when the market bottoms. No one wants to buy the dip thinking it is the end and that is when the next cycle actually begins.

Article Produced By
Jefe Caan

I work as the key Trading Analyst for Crypto Daily and provide the team with regular analyses and updates regarding the technical performance of all cryptocurrencies on the market. I am responsible for the production of articles and posts for Crypto Daily’s own technical analysis section and spend my time monitoring and commenting on the varied moves the markets make on a daily basis.

https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2019/10/ethereum-next-big-move-is-just-around-the-corner

David https://markethive.com/david-ogden

See How Apple Are Utilising The Blockchain

See How Apple Are Utilising The Blockchain

                                         

Apple Inc are best known for their flagship iMac and iPhone products,

though historically, of course, it all really started (in the mainstream at least) with the launch of the iPod. Apple Inc is a US-based multinational company that specialises in the design and development of various hardware and software products and are often considered as Microsoft's only true rival in terms of tech dominance. With an estimated revenue of $265.595 billion in 2018, it’s clear to see that Apple are frankly huge. It’s also clear that such a large tech firm will wish to explore blockchain technology sooner, rather than later. No, Apple aren’t launching their own Applecoin or iCoin just yet, however, according to reports out during the middle of last week, Apple Inc have confirmed that they will be using blockchain technology to explore new methods of manufacture that aim to make Apple’s hardware products far more environmentally friendly.

According to CCN:

“When you think of Apple, you think iPhone, iPad, or even privacy concerns. You probably don’t think conflict minerals used in the manufacturing of its devices or how blockchain could prove the cure for an ethical supply chain. Well, you should. The tech giant has filed a report with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission indicating it is studying ways to implement Blockchain in some form or fashion.”

Now, within their filing Apple have not actually said they will be using blockchain technology, rather they simply hint at the fact that they could use the blockchain in order to find solutions designed to make their sourcing of natural minerals and products more ethical.

 

This comes after Apple pledged to work in a more efficient manner back in 2018:

“In 2018, Apple chaired the board of the Responsible Business Alliance, served on the Steering Committee of the RMI, continued its participation in the European Partnership for Responsible Minerals, and served on the Governance Committee of the Public-Private Alliance for Responsible Minerals Trade. Apple also contributed to several RMI working groups, including, but not limited to, the working groups for tin, gold, and other minerals; the smelter engagement team; the Blockchain team; and the minerals reporting template team.”

Blockchain technology can seriously transform the way companies like Apple source the products that they need to make intricate pieces of hardware that go into the iPhone and the iMac. Audit trails, database maintenance and of course, product authentication can all benefit from blockchain integration, perhaps Apple have finally realised that?

Article Produced By
Adrian Barkley

Adrian has been leading teams in the finance sector for over a decade. He is highly experienced, and is responsible for ensuring that the latest news is delivered to you as it is breaking. He has a keen interest in virtual currencies, and has even made investments himself, so is incredibly passionate when it comes to writing about this topic.

https://cryptodaily.co.uk/2019/02/see-how-apple-utilising-blockchain

David https://markethive.com/david-ogden

Malware Costing Just 160 Attempts Crypto Theft from 72000 Devices

Malware Costing Just $160 Attempts Crypto Theft from 72,000 Devices

                               

Researchers believe a malware botnet that costs just $160 has interacted with potentially 2,000 machines per week

in attempts at stealing crypto wallets and personal information. Prevailion, the U.S.-based cybersecurity management provider, posted an article on its blog detailing how MasterMana Botnet has likely been active since December 2018 and was still active as late as September 24. With the potential to hit 2,000 machines a week, the botnet may, therefore have interacted with more than 72,000 devices this year.

Cyber Bingo Full House

Authors Danny Adamitis and Matt Thompson described MasterMana Botnet as an "ongoing cyber-crime campaign that hits all of the cyber bingo buzzwords: business email compromise, backdoors, and cryptocurrency wallets". Once victims opened the phishing email it would reveal an infected document attachment. Opening this document would then release the bot designed to steal usernames, passwords, cookies, web history and cryptocurrency wallets. The authors underlined the irony of such a threat: malware that costs just $100, and launched over a $60 virtual private server (VPS) was sophisticated enough to avoid detection from security systems that are becoming ever-more expensive.

They added:

While most companies fear they may become compromised by advanced actors, this particular report highlights that actors do not have to rely on advanced tools or techniques to have a serious business impact.

Article Produced By
Neil Dennis

Neil is a veteran financial journalist, but a relative newcomer to the land of cryptocurrencies and blockchain and brings a critical, yet fascinated, eye to the digital asset market.

https://www.cryptoglobe.com/latest/2019/10/malware-costing-just-160-attempts-crypto-theft-from-72000-devices/

David https://markethive.com/david-ogden

Hacker Who Grabbed Top-Level Ethereum Domains Voluntarily Returns Them

Hacker Who Grabbed Top-Level Ethereum Domains Voluntarily Returns Them

                                

The hacker who managed to exploit an auction by the Ethereum Naming Service (ENS)

to grab top-level domains has voluntarily returned the domains he took. Since September 1 digital collectibles marketplace OpenSea has been having an Ethereum domain auction, where “.eth” domains are being auctioned to the highest bidder. These domains, unlike those working on the standard DNS domain, can’t be forcibly retrieved once allocated, as they’re on the Ethereum blockchain. Using an exploit in the auction software distributing the ENS domains to participants, the hacker managed to get a hold of top-level domains like “apple.eth”, “defi.eth,” and “wallet.eth” without being the highest bidder. Overall, the user took 17 domains.

OpenSea wrote in a blog post:

One user discovered an input validation vulnerability that allowed them to place bids on a name that actually issued a different name.

The auction suffered from other issues, as domains like “bitmex.eth” and “hodls.eth” had bids incorrectly processed. These weren’t, however, affected by the exploit. The affected domains were initially blacklisted by OpenSea, although the marketplace asked the hacker to return the domains so they can be re-auctioned. In return, it offered the hacker a reward of 25% of the final auction price, as well as the original bid. The offer seems to have worked as on Twitter, OpenSea revealed the domains were voluntarily returned.

Article Produced By
Francisco Memoria

Francisco is a cryptocurrency writer who's in love with technology and focuses on helping people see the value digital currencies have. His work has been published in numerous reputable industry publications. Francisco holds various cryptocurrencies

https://www.cryptoglobe.com/latest/2019/10/hacker-who-grabbed-top-level-ethereum-domains-voluntarily-returns-them/

David https://markethive.com/david-ogden

World’s Largest Furniture Retailer Uses Programmable Cash on Ethereum to Settle Invoice

World’s Largest Furniture Retailer Uses Programmable Cash on Ethereum to Settle Invoice

                                

Retail giant IKEA has settled an invoice with a local retailer using an Ethereum-based token.

Supply chain payments platform Tradeshift transferred a digital version of the Icelandic króna that was created on Ethereum by fintech company Monerium. Ethereum, an open source, public blockchain, allows developers to create a number of financial tools to power the digital economy while stripping away middlemen. Through the use of smart contracts, which are executed once agreed upon terms are met on both sides of a deal, trust is established without the need for third-party intermediaries. Smart contracts effectively reduce burdensome paperwork and eliminate redundant verification procedures.

Stefán Árnason, chief financial officer of IKEA Iceland, says the platform, which connects the money and payments flow to the invoicing to the actual inventory, squashing “double dip financing fraud”, will alter business relationships. “A programmable financial supply chain, where trading partners can connect information flows to money flows through smart contracts, will transform how suppliers and customers interact.”

Gert Sylvest, co-founder of Tradeshift, says “smart invoices” allow merchants to represent future cash flow down to each dollar on the invoice. Payments can be programmed to settle on the actual due date, raising the bar on other services such as short-term credit to small and large companies that can be delivered automatically.

The Ethereum-based e-money differs from cryptocurrencies in that it represents fiat currency.

Says Sveinn Valfells, co-founder and CEO of Monerium, “Unlike cryptocurrency which is volatile, e-money is a proven digital alternative to cash, regulated and redeemable on demand. Using programmable e-money in smart contracts heralds a new category of payments.” The e-money movement is in line with IKEA’s efforts to streamline and conserve. The retail giant, founded in 1943, is responding to a changing world and the impact of e-commerce giant Amazon by taking a number of steps to modernize its business practices, reduce emissions and simplify manual procedures.

Article Produced By
The Daily Hodl Staff

https://dailyhodl.com/2019/10/03/worlds-largest-furniture-retailer-uses-programmable-cash-on-ethereum-to-settle-invoice/

 

 

 

David https://markethive.com/david-ogden

Brooklyn Nets Point Guard Looks To Break New Ground In NBA With Tokenized Contract

Brooklyn Nets Point Guard Looks To Break New Ground In NBA With Tokenized Contract

Have you ever wanted to invest in an NBA player's future? It might be possible in the upcoming season. 

Spencer Dinwiddie, a Brooklyn Nets point guard, is planning to securitize his NBA contract in the form of a digital token asset tied to his three-year, $34 million contract extension. The decision would allow Dinwiddie to raise money upfront, as opposed to waiting three years to be paid out in full, and investors would be paid principal plus interest over the course of the deal.

The Deal

Dinwiddie is planning to start his own company to sell the offering and make investments upon fundraising, according to Fox Business. “This is a newer concept utilizing the power of blockchain and crypto and bypassing a third-party intermediary. We will see how it goes and if it’s successful — and whether the league has an opinion on [whether] this is something that should be allowed under the current collective bargaining agreement,” sports attorney Darren Heitner told Benzinga.

Little else is known about the extent of the offer as well as what Dinwiddie plans to do with the money he raises. The move is certainly not without risk, and Heitner recommends potential investors do proper due diligence before investing. “To an extent I believe he is breaking new ground, and I hope he is resting on the advice of his advisors, but I certainly wouldn't advise this route to any of my clients.” Dinwiddie is certainly not without competition on the court either, after his team signed point guards Kyrie Irving and rookie phenom Jaylen Hands in the offseason.

Article Produced By
Brett Hershman

Benzinga Staff Writer

https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/19/09/14453379/brooklyn-nets-point-guard-looks-to-break-new-ground-in-nba-with-tokenized-contract

David https://markethive.com/david-ogden

Ripple Avoids Securities Question in Motion to Dismiss XRP Lawsuit

Ripple Avoids Securities Question in Motion to Dismiss XRP Lawsuit

                             

 

Ripple has filed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit claiming it violated U.S. securities laws

by selling XRP. In a new filing posted early Friday, attorneys for Ripple pushed back on allegations made by XRP purchasers suing the company, its subsidiaries and executives. Notably, the motion to dismiss specifically claims that the plaintiff, Bradley Sostack, does not have standing to file a complaint, rather than address claims that XRP is a security.

In the motion to dismiss, Ripple states that the plaintiff failed to bring a case within three years of the initial offering (which would have been 2013), meaning the statute of repose expired; that the plaintiff did not “plausibly allege” that he purchased XRP during the initial offering; and that the plaintiff did not “plausibly allege” that any of the defendants actually sold the XRP that he bought. Notably absent from the motion to dismiss is a full-fledged argument over why XRP is not a security. Indeed, the filing only addresses the question in a footnote (footnote 19), which states that XRP is not a security “because it is not an ‘investment contract.'”

The filing goes on to say:

“Purchasing XRP is not an ‘investment’ in Ripple; there is no common enterprise between Ripple and XRP purchasers; there was no promise that Ripple would help generate profits for XRP holders; and the XRP Ledger is decentralized.”

The footnote also adds that “because XRP is a currency,” it cannot also be a security under law. The filing states that the court itself does not need to determine “whether XRP is a security or currency for purposes of this motion, which assumes Plaintiff’s allegation that XRP is a security.” The filing also states that “the federal Departments of Treasury and Justice publicly concluded that XRP is a ‘convertible virtual currency,'” in its “factual background” section. “This is consistent with the CFTC’s position that virtual currency is a commodity,” the filing states. “Nonetheless, Plaintiff alleges that XRP is a ‘security’ under federal and state law, … and that Defendants have offered and sold XRP despite its non-registration with securities authorities.”

Moving to dismiss

Ripple’s actual arguments focus on when the most recent case has been filed, with the first hinging around the fact that XRP entered the market in 2013.

The filing states:

“… under Plaintiff’s own allegations, Defendants offered XRP to the public throughout 2013 through 2015. Accordingly, the three-year statute of repose expired as of 2016 (three years after the sales cited in the May 2015 settlement) and in no case later than May 2018 (three years after the May 2015 settlement agreement in which ‘Defendants acknowledged that they had sold XRP to the general public,’ Complaint ¶ 25). The Securities Act claims in the Complaint, filed August 5, 2019, are therefore untimely and barred by the statute of repose.”

The filing adds that the plaintiff does not claim he bought XRP directly from Ripple or another defendant, but rather, “he was part of the ‘general public’ who purchased XRP through transactions in a two-week period in January 2018.” “The necessary inference is that he bought and sold XRP through a secondary trading exchange,” the filing says. The response also states that plaintiff’s consumer protection claims under California state law (rather than federal securities law) should be dismissed because the statutes require a securities claim. As a result, the response says, the complaint should be dismissed with prejudice

(meaning plaintiffs would not be able to re-file the suit).

“Leave to amend should be denied because amendment would be futile.”

Year-long case

Ripple’s filing comes a month and a half after the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, alleging the company, affiliated entities and individuals violated both state and federal securities laws. The new complaint, filed by law firms Susman Godfrey and Tayler-Copeland Law, alleges that Ripple, its subsidiary XRP II, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse and others violated securities law by selling XRP. In a first, the complaint borrowed from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s digital assets framework, drawing parallels between the SEC’s analysis for what constitutes a security and Ripple’s alleged actions. The case itself stretches back to early 2018, when XRP purchasers first began filing lawsuits against Ripple. The complaints alleged that Ripple sold XRP, using the proceeds to fund its operations. The cases were consolidated into the current form.

While the class has not been certified yet, Thursday’s filing is still the first time Ripple has had to respond to the substance of the complaints against it. At the heart of the matter is the question of whether XRP is a security. Some of Ripple’s detractors claim it is, one that is issued and managed by Ripple. The startup disagrees, saying XRP is a token created by Jed McCaleb (now at Interstellar), Arthur Britto and David Schwartz. It remains to be seen whether the case proceeds to a jury trial, or if settlement talks occur first. However, the filing notes that there is a hearing scheduled for early next year, and the attorneys say they are willing to argue the motion then.

Legal team shake up

Friday’s filing comes just days after Ripple brought Damien Marshall and Kathleen Hartnett, two lawyers with Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, on board to work on the case (a judge approved their appearance for the case on Sept. 17). They join Skadden Arps attorneys Peter Morrison, John Neukom and Virgina Milstead, who have been listed on the docket but whose names did not appear on the filing Friday morning. On Thursday night, former SEC Division of Enforcement director Andrew Ceresney also applied to join the case as a lawyer for Ripple. Ceresney is currently an attorney with Debevoise & Plimpton, an international law firm based in New York, and his name appeared on Friday’s filing. He previously represented Ripple against one of the previous class action lawsuits, filed by plaintiff Ryan Coffey, alongside former SEC Chair Mary Jo White. That case was voluntarily dismissed, and White’s work for Ripple appears to have ended around that time.

Article Produced By
Nikhilesh De

Nik is a business reporter at CoinDesk with a focus on regulators, lawmakers and institutions. He was previously a news, science, technology and community reporter and editor with The Daily Targum. His work has been featured in The Nation and referenced by The Washington Post, ZDNet, Gizmodo, NJ Advance Media and The Philadelphia Inquirer. He owns less than $20 in BTC and has no other crypto holdings.

https://www.coindesk.com/ripple-avoids-securities-question-in-motion-to-dismiss-xrp-lawsuit

David https://markethive.com/david-ogden